Contact: Jesha Miller FOR IMMEDIATE PRESS RELEASE
Evansville In. 47714
Corruption by Federal Judge Richard Young
A Civil Complaint was filed January 21, 2011 against the U.S. for corruption in the entire Judicial Branch of government by Jesha Miller the
plaintiff. Federal Judge Richard Young, district Court for the Southern District of Indiana dismissed the complaint when he is implemented in the complaint
& failed his duty to enforce the rule of law under Title 18, sec. 242, 243, & 245. A Judge cannot dismiss a complaint when he is part of the corruption because he will never find himself guilty, as would not any other criminal.
The complaint is centered around officials failing to enforce the rule of law
which includes, from Judge Righard Young, Judge Sarah Evans Barker, to
U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder & the U.S. Supreme Court to President Barack Obama whose number 1 duty is to enforce federal law under Article II. sec. 3 of the Constitution to make sure that the federal laws are enforced. This denied Jesha Miller's right to a trial by jury under the 7th Amendment.
With abuse of power & corruption in the U.S. Supreme Court whose motive was to cover-up the Federal Crime by Vanderburgh County Judge David Kiely under Title 18, sec. 243, which is the exclusion of jurors on account of race & deny 10 million dollars upon his release from the illegal restraint. Jesha Miller is now filing a motion to reinstate his Civil Complaint because he must have an opportunity to prove Political & Judicial Corruption & hold officials accountable for their actions as all other citizens are held accountable for violating the Constitution & Laws of the U.S. The dismissal is clearly to continue the cover-up of government corruption as the Constitution requires each Branch to be checked when abuse of power & corruption are alleged. Each official is accused because it is directly related to his duty.
Respectfully Submitted- Jesha Miller
February 17, 2011 --- Black History Month
Motion to reinstate to below article for media to publish
Case 3:11-cv-13-RLY-WGH Filed February 16 2011 Page 1 of 9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF INDIANA
JESHA MILLER, ) Case requires to be
vs. ) 3: 11-cv-13-RLY-WGH
USA, President Barack Obama, et al., )
Judge Richard Young dismisses case violating rights under color of law, to hide government corruption & aids Judge David Kiely from justice. THE FEDERAL CONSTITUTION SUPERSEDES ANY CASE LAW REQUIRING REINSTATEMENT OF THE CASE TO BE HEARD BY A JURY & ALL DEFENDANTS MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE, INCLUDING JUDGE RICHARD YOUNG FOR HIS ATTEMPT TO DENY RIGHTS GUARANTEED HOLDING AN OFFICIAL OFFICE. This is to prevent the Constitutions checks & balances which will expose corruption from the U.S. Supreme Court on down to State Courts. An unprecedented event proving there is no longer an avenue to justice.
Oppression, to keep the plaintiff Jesha Miller from gaining justice & economic security. The dismissal is an overt act to hide corruption on the part of government officials who have denied the Constitutional rights of Blacks in defiance of the Constitutions guarantee to justice, equality, & the pursuit of happiness. Specifically, delaying for as long as possible any action that exposes Judicial corruption, holds officials accountable, & fails to pay Jesha Miller money for default on securing those rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights & advancement of two (2) million dollars for that delay.
The Bill of Rights, embodied in the first ten amendments ratified in 1791, secures the rights of the individual against the federal government. Of even greater significance are the protection that the federal Constitution secures against the states. JUDGE RICHARD YOUNG VIOLATES MY RIGHTS UNDER COLOR OF LAW BY DISMISSING CIVIL COMPLAINT
Case No. 3:11-cv-013 RLY-WGH when he himself is implemented as an official who also failed to enforce Title 18, sec. 243.
Claim III. Judge Richard Young was assigned my case but there was a conflict of interest because he was the Chief Judge of Vanderburgh County when Judge David Kiely committed the crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 so I doubted he would enforce the Rule of Law.
Judge Richard Young will now be included in my Articles of Impeachment, petitioned to be taken to the floor by Congressman Larry Bucshon as he violates my rights under color of law to prevent the operation of the Constitutions checks & balances & denies those rights guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.
18 USC sec. 242 provides that whoever, under color of law, statute, ordinance, regulation, or custom, willfully subjects any person in any State, Territory, Commonwealth, Possession, or District to the deprivation of any rights, privileges, or immunities secured or protected by the Constitution or laws of the United States ...shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
In the impeachment investigation they should review my case when I was illegally imprisoned against the Constitution & Laws of the U.S., Judge Richard Young withdrew himself citing a conflict of interest because he was the Chief Judge at Indiana's Vanderburgh County when Judge David Kiely committed the Federal Crime pursuant to Title 18, sec. 243 & was told by me, signed by notary public that I was about to be railroaded & did nothing to stop the crime.
Judge Richard Young was assigned my case where I was Granted to proceed in forma pauperis & did so by having the Court enforce Title 18, sec. 243 & indict & arrest Judge David Kiely & he failed to enforce the law then to protect my right to a fair trial & refused. The case was then assigned to Judge Sarah Evans Barker.
This case is against the Federal Government which I claim is corrupt throughout the entire judicial Branch of government & his action only affirm this to be true. The Bill of Rights, embodied in the first ten amendments ratified in 1791, secures the rights of the individual against the federal government. Jurisdiction is by the Bill of Rights, rights which government must protect so the case must be reinstated because the rights violated by officials are those protected under the Bill of Rights. The nature of the case is that I, Jesha Miller have been denied the unalienable rights to a fair trial & there has been a government cover-up to hide this corruption from the public so that they are not held accountable.
Judge Richard Young tries to separate me from the unalienable right, "all men are created equal", which is in Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.'s speech, meaning I am entitled to the right to a fair trial, protected by the 6th Amendment. The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is the part of the United States Bill of Rights which sets forth rights related to criminal prosecutions. In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State. Because the complaints cause of action is because I have been denied the right to a fair trial protected by the Bill of Rights, which is to be used against the federal government, Judge Richard Young has dismissed this case when I've demanded a trial by jury. For that reason the case must be reinstated because he violates Title 18 sec. 242, willfully subjecting me to the deprivation of my right to file Civil Complaint due to the Rights protected under the Bill of Rights being violated by officials.
Judge Richard Young also aids & abets Judge David Kiely from justice as there is evidence from the trial transcripts, affirming to be fact that my race was excluded from the jury selection when Judge David Kiely was given warning that the law would not support his actions. That it would be part of the records that he did not have a cross section of the community & he was violating due process, violating the 14th Amendments due process as mandated by the State & Federal Constitution. The record shows he was told this & chose to violate the 13th & 14 Amendments, taking my rights to freedom in violation of the Constitution & laws of the U.S.
Judge Richard Young, being an officials who refuses to enforce the law & protect Judge Kiely from justice should be impeached from office & held accountable for his actions. Again, at issue is the fact that the entire Judicial Branch of government is corrupt from the U.S. Supreme Court on down. When the highest Court is corrupt then there is no chance of Justice & it must be checked by the Constitutions checks & balances for abuse of power to reinstate the integrity into the Judicial Branch of government & until then, officials are running a corrupt government. The Constitution supersedes all case laws presented by Judge Richard Young to dismiss the case, as this is an unprecedented event in American History, exposing corruption throughout the Judicial Branch of government. The case must therefore be reinstated & all defendants must be held accountable, including Judges, Politicians, & President Barack Obama.
The Supremacy Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution, Article VI, Clause 2. This clause asserts and establishes the Constitution, the federal laws made in pursuance of the Constitution, and treaties made by the United States with foreign nations as "the Supreme Law of the Land.
The text of Article VI, Clause 2, establishes these as the highest form of law in the American legal system, both in the Federal courts and in all of the State courts, mandating that all state judges shall uphold them, even if there are state laws or state constitutions that conflict with the powers of the Federal government.
Article VI of the Constitution states the document and the laws of the United States which "shall be made in pursuance thereof..." are the "Supreme Law of the Land." The phrase, "shall be made in pursuance thereof" indicates the Constitution is the ultimate authority to which all other laws and treaties must conform.
EVIDENCE JUDGE YOUNG IS A PART OF
JUDICIAL CORRUPTION & IS DISQUALIFIED TO
ENTER ANY JUDGMENT
Filed- April 29, 2010 3:10-cv-RLY-WGH
Plaintiff GRANTED TO PROCEED in forma pauperis does so by demanding Court issue indictment & arrest for all plaintiff's given legal
warning denying rights under color of law. Plaintiff's power is by the Constitutions checks & balances..... The plaintiff demands indictment & arrest of Judge David Kiely of Vanderburgh County.
Here Judge Richard Young refuses to carry out the rule of law pursuant to Title 18 sec. 243 where the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Statute, approving the congressional determination that such exclusion prohibitions of the equal protection clause. The transcripts affirm the allegations to be factual, then THE OFFICIALS RESPONSIBLE ACTED IN VIOLATION of the CONSTITUTION, DENYING POTENTIAL BLACK JURORS THE EQUAL OPPORTUNITY TO PARTICIPATE IN THE ADMINISTRATION OF JUSTICE. Strauder v. West Virginia, 100 U.S. 303. This aided all defendants from justice in violation of Title 18 sec. 242, 243, & 245.
This is a White Supremacist act of violating the rights of Blacks without being held accountable.
Every defendant is accused of Judicial or Political corruption because it is directly related to his duty under the Constitution of the U.S. The case is brought because the entire Judicial Branch is corrupt, which calls for immediate action because there is no longer an avenue to justice as required by the Constitution which guarantees the right to freedom, justice, equality, & the pursuit of happiness.
The Bill of Rights have been violated & Judge Richard Young aids officials who have violated these rights in defiance of the constitution.
The Bill of Rights is a series of limitations on the power of the United States federal government, protecting the natural rights of liberty and property including freedom of speech, a free press, free assembly, and free association, as well as the right to keep and bear arms. In federal criminal cases, it requires indictment by a grand jury for any capital or "infamous crime", guarantees a speedy, public trial with an impartial jury composed of members of the state or judicial district in which the crime occurred, and prohibits double jeopardy.
RELIEF- Reinstate- Case No. 3:11 cv-013 RLY-WGH
To bring back into use or existence. 2. To restore to a previous condition or position.
For this reason, the case should be reinstated in the interest of justice because there is no longer an avenue to justice when accused of abuse of power is the U.S. Supreme Court itself. It is the history of America to deny these natural born rights to Blacks. It was for that reason that the 13th, 14th, & 15th Amendments were added to the Bill of Rights to protect the rights of Black & later they helped secure the rights of all Americans by the 14th Amendments due process.
This dismissal on the grounds of being frivolous is another act to cover-up the Judicial Corruption for as long as possible or until I, Jesha Miller, dies or is killed to hide government corruption. The checks & balances are a historical event in American history intended by the Framers of the Constitution to prevent abuse of power, protect the rights of "we the people'
& hold officials accountable for their actions so it is because this will expose
corruption in the Judicial Branch of government it has been dismissed & for no other reason. If they are innocent they have the opportunity to prove that but what Judge Richard Young is doing is denying me, Jesha Miller, even the opportunity to prove abuse of power & corruption in the Branch of government of which he is a part because he has seen evidence already admitted proving this to be fact. No Judge can give judgment on an issue of which he is a part of the crime because he will never find himself guilty. Proven to be true by Judge Richard Young's dismissal when he is implemented to refusing to enforce the rule of law & indict Judge David Kiely.
In Granting me to proceed in Forma Pauperis, underlined on the first page he is informed that this involves the unalienable right "all men are created equal"
so for no reason other than evil intent can he separate me from my right to a trial by jury under the Constitutions 7th Amendment. This is of immediate concern of corruption because these are the rights that government must protect.
I MUST HAVE OPPORTUNITY TO PROVE THIS IN A COURT OF LAW.
( Evidence submitted with petition to reinstate)
oppress - come down on or keep down by unjust use of one's authority; "The government oppresses political activists"
the act of subjugating by cruelty; "the tyrant's oppression of the people"
the state of being kept down by unjust use of force or authority: "after years of oppression they finally revolted" a feeling of being oppressed
oppress - persecute: cause to suffer; "
Judge Richard Young's evil acts of cruelty, denying my rights under color of law when written in front of the U.S. Supreme Court is the promise of equality, when in reality officials have been violating these rights to Blacks for Century's. Government refuses to address the checks & balances when petitioned to do so, or acknowledge the Bill of Rights which no just government can refuse or rest on inference is clear evidence of a corrupt government.
Judge Richard Young oppress's me economically because government has defaulted on the Constitutions gurantee to freedom & justice & violating nearly all of the Bill of Rights Amendments, rights government must protect.
The motive was to deny 10 million dollars upon my relase from the illegal restraint & 40 million dollars in punitive damages to prevent government officials from denying those rights they have taken oath to protect. With this motion to reinstate due to Judge Richard Young denying my rights under color of law when the complaint is against the federal government that must be checked for corruption. It is because he is a part of that corruption he has dismissed the case.
RESULTS OF OPPRESSION
The Court was informed I, Jesha Miller, a veteran of the Viet-Nam Era
was in danger of being evicted if they did not advance 2 million dollars of the 50 million I would have already received were it not for Judicial corruption as they have defaulted on the guaranteed rights to freedom & justice. I am a journeyman machinist & previously had a clean record. It is part of my relief to have reversal of the conviction & restore that clean record & my name.
I have now been evicted from my residence at 1011 Lincoln Ave. A letter from Gail Vails is submitted as evidence she told me to move out by January 31, 2011 who is the property manager.
I am still in need of dental work, body therapy, new transportation, & a house to live. Money so that I can travel & stay in Washington D.C. until this litagation is over & advertisement so that the people are informed of the corruption in the Judicial Branch of government.
Also submitted is the relief I would have received from the U.S. Supreme Court had they performed their duty when addressed by a Habeas Corpus. This is 10 million upon my release & 40 million in punitive damages so that future officials will not committ the same violation regarding the rights in the Bill of Rights that government must protect.
Wherefore, the plaintiff prays to YHWH, creator of the world, that this Honorable Court immediately GRANT REINSTATEMENT and 2 million dollars in advance of the money I, Jesha Miller would have already received had there not been a government cover-up & acknowledge the Constitution, Bill of Rights, the Constitutions checks & balances, & committed evil acts such as Judge Richard Youngs dismissal violating my 7th Amendment Right to a trial by Jury. The case will not fail because those rights violated are guaranteed by the Bill of Rights.
PROOF OF SERVICE
I, Jesha Donaldson Miller, do affirm that on January 31 2011, at 8:18 am. the Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller received a copy of the Civil Complaint. February 3, 2011, at 11:07 am. U.S. Attorney Eric Holder received a copy of the complaint, & February 4, 2011 President Barack Obama received a copy of the Civil Complaint. Deputy Prosecuter Matt F. Keppler's copy of the complaint was hand delivered to his office & is submitted with a copy stamp received by his office. Judge Sarah Evans Barker's will be hand delivered to the Federal Building, as well as FBI agent Brian Flaherty February 17, 2011. All other defendants will receive a copy of the Civil Complaint to be mailed by February 19, 2011 due to my economic situation.
It is petitioned that the Court issue an Order of reinstatement on February 19, 2011, to all defendants should I, Jesha Miller be Granted reinstatement by the Court.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true & correct to the best of my knowledge & mailed within 10 days of this motion to reinstate, this February 17, 2011.
Jesha Miller - _______________________________
Evansville In. 47714
( New address )